We Against You by Fredrik Backman
A Mixed Bag: My Thoughts on 'My Against You'
summarizeEditor's Summary
I just finished reading the second part of the 'Medvedy Ugol' trilogy, 'My Against You', and I'm still reeling from it. While the first part was absolutely perfect and spot on, I have some issues with the second part. The story of the small town of Børnstad continues, but the second part doesn't feel like it's been forced out of thin air or manufactured to ride the success of the first book. I gotta say, the plot is engaging, but it's not without its flaws. If you enjoyed the first part, you'll likely enjoy the second part too, but be prepared for some mixed emotions. One of the things that kept me invested in the story was the well-developed characters. They're relatable, and the author does a great job of exploring their emotional depth. The writing is descriptive and immersive, making it easy to get lost in the world of the story. However, the pacing can be a bit uneven at times, and some of the plot twists feel forced and unearned. The themes of the book are thought-provoking, but they're not always well-explored. The ending feels a bit abrupt and doesn't provide enough closure, which was a bit disappointing. Overall, I'd say that 'My Against You' is a mixed bag. It's not the strongest part of the trilogy, but it's still worth reading if you're invested in the story and characters.
settingsSpecifications
live_helpFeatured FAQ
Is the second part of the 'Medvedy Ugol' trilogy as good as the first part?
While the first part was absolutely perfect and spot on, the second part has some issues. It feels like it's been rushed and doesn't quite live up to the first part.
What's the plot of 'My Against You'?
The story of the small town of Børnstad continues, but the second part doesn't feel like it's been forced out of thin air or manufactured to ride the success of the first book.
Are the characters well-developed in 'My Against You'?
Yes, the characters are well-developed and relatable. The author does a great job of exploring their emotional depth.
Is the writing in 'My Against You' descriptive and immersive?
Yes, the writing is descriptive and immersive. It's a great job of transporting you to the world of the story.
What are the themes of 'My Against You'?
The themes of the book are thought-provoking, but they're not always well-explored. The book raises interesting questions and makes you think.
Is the ending of 'My Against You' satisfying?
The ending feels a bit abrupt and doesn't provide enough closure. It's not the strongest part of the book, but it's still worth reading.
Is 'My Against You' worth reading?
If you enjoyed the first part, you'll likely enjoy the second part too. It's not without its flaws, but it's still a great read.
Can I return 'My Against You' if I don't like it?
Yes, you can return 'My Against You' if you don't like it. The return policy is straightforward and easy to understand.
How does 'My Against You' compare to the first part of the trilogy?
While the first part was absolutely perfect and spot on, the second part has some issues. It feels like it's been rushed and doesn't quite live up to the first part.
check_circlePros
- •The plot is engaging and continues the story of the small town of Børnstad
- •The characters are well-developed and relatable
- •The author does a great job of exploring the emotional depth of the characters
- •The writing is descriptive and immersive
- •The story is thought-provoking and raises interesting questions
- •The pacing is well-balanced and keeps you invested in the story
- •The themes of the book are well-explored and resonate with the reader
- •The characters' development is consistent and satisfying
cancelCons
- •The second part feels like it's been rushed and doesn't quite live up to the first part
- •There's too much politics involved, which can be overwhelming at times
- •Some of the plot twists feel forced and unearned
- •The character development is a bit uneven
- •The themes of the book are not always well-explored
- •The ending feels a bit abrupt and doesn't provide enough closure
- •The pacing can be a bit uneven at times
- •The book could benefit from a more detailed world-building
