photo_library94

visibility6

Silent Hill: Revelation 3D (2012)

I just watched Silent Hill: Revelation 3D, a 2012 horror flick that's got all the right ingredients to keep you up all night. Directed by Michael J. Bassett, this sequel to the original Silent Hill film follows Heather Mason as she digs into the dark secrets of her past. Let's just say what she uncovers will leave you sleeping with the lights on. The movie's got a great mix of suspense, creepy atmosphere, and plenty of jump scares to keep you on the edge of your seat.

chevron_right

A Disappointing Sequel: Silent Hill: Revelation Falls Short of Expectations

Name: A Disappointing Sequel: Silent Hill: Revelation Falls Short of Expectations
Item: Silent Hill: Revelation 3D (2012)
Rating: 3
Author: Jason_Fields

summarizeEditor's Summary

I just finished watching Silent Hill: Revelation, and I've got to say, it's a total letdown compared to the first movie. The atmosphere starts off creepy, but it quickly loses its grip. The opening credits set the tone with fog and ash, but that's about it. The plot tries to follow Heather, a teenager who moves to a new town and starts experiencing intense nightmares and glitches, but it's just not as engaging as the original. The movie's attempt to connect Heather's story to the mysterious Alessa falls flat. The plot's predictable and lacks tension, making it hard to get invested in the story. The atmosphere, while creepy at first, quickly becomes dull. The movie's use of horror tropes feels like a lazy attempt to scare the audience. The pacing is slow and plodding, making it hard to stay engaged. The movie's themes are underdeveloped and feel like an afterthought. The visuals are decent, but they're not as impressive as the first film. The cast, including Sean Bean and Carrie-Anne Moss, deliver solid performances, even if the plot doesn't give them much to work with.

settingsSpecifications

KararKötü

Grafik8/10

Hikaye5/10

Atmosfer6/10

Oyunculuk7/10

DizininKalite4/10

I just finished watching Silent Hill: Revelation, and I have to say, it was a major letdown compared to the first movie. The atmosphere was creepy at the beginning, but it quickly lost its grip. The opening credits set the tone with fog and ash, but that's about it.

The Basics.

Movie Title: Silent Hill: Revelation Year: 2012 Country: USA, Canada, France Genre: Horror, Thriller Director: Michael J. Bassett Cast: Sean Bean, Carrie-Anne Moss, Malcolm McDowell, Roberto Campanella, Kit Harington, Rade Serbedzija, Adelaide Clemens, Deborah Kara Unger, Erin Pitt, Martin Donovan

The movie follows Heather, a teenager who moves to a new town and starts experiencing intense nightmares and glitches. She soon discovers she has a connection to Silent Hill and the mysterious Alessa.

What really caught my eye was the creepy clown face and that girl running away from something. I have to say, it was a relief to see Volterra from my favorite Twilight series show up. I was getting a little tired of their fanbase, so it was nice to see them take a different route.

The golden fish is hinting at a bittersweet ending, I think.

At first, I was blown away by the opening scene - it's seriously effective. I loved it. Atmosphere really knows how to build tension.

Warning: keep an eye out for Sharon from the first film - she's the blonde who's always on the run. And Christopher's not far behind her.

What's going on? Where's Rose? I'm not giving anything away... So, Heather - that's what Sharon from the first movie is now called - moves in with her dad, starts at a new school, and in the meantime, she's dealing with some pretty intense nightmares and some really realistic glitches. ]]> ]]> ]]> Ugh, these next scenes are just as cringeworthy as the first movie. Watching them made me feel queasy.

]]> In school, Heather meets and starts befriending the charming Vincent! I'm not familiar with this actor (Kit Harington), but he's way better than the lead actress. Honestly, I've heard that Saoirse Ronan was considered for the role of Heather, and I think she would've done a much better job! Heather nails the dark scenes, but the light ones are a total snooze fest.

]]> ]]> Heather's nightmares and glitches follow her relentlessly, and the cherry on top (and a total cliché) is her dad's disappearance and the creepy book found in the wreckage.

I have to say, the little Alessa in the movie didn't impress me. It was a letdown compared to the previous one.

The movie focuses way too much on the scars on human skin. It's just ridiculous!

When Dalia appeared on screen, I burst out laughing. Out loud. How did she manage to look younger after a few years? And why does she look even better than she did in the first part? It's crazy!

And then there's the antagonist - she's amazing! Charismatic, ruthless, and fanatically devoted to her cause. She's just as good as the one in the previous movie.

I was a bit worried that the product would be too intimidating for older people, but the execution fell short of the mark!

But my favorite nurses in this product are just amazing! They're just as flexible and intimidating as the ones in the first movie - I think they literally took them straight from the film, and that's spot on! The scene with them was intense and really stuck with me - I loved it! The appearance of Allesa was also on point! And it's a moment that's really stuck with me. You know, despite all the computer graphics in the movie, it's actually in the scenes with the nurses and the Carousel scene with Allesa where you see it the least. - Go to Hell! - You don't see? We're already in Hell.

This little dialogue really stuck with me. It's not just applicable to the movie, but also to our world in some ways. I won't get into the details, but it's definitely something to think about.

The fight scene between the two antagonists left me with mixed feelings - it looked super intense and bloody at first, but then I started to feel a bit relaxed because it's all just CGI. Although the makeup and the woman's appearance were pretty unsettling. And then, the final part is left open again. There are hints at a third part, but I'm not a fan of that idea. Two is enough. The second part is a letdown compared to the first. The main character's acting is subpar, the music is awful, and the monsters aren't as scary as they were in the first movie. They could've come up with something new, and it would've been more interesting. The colorful characters, like that blonde woman or the nurses, are barely shown in the film. The unexpected moments aren't so unexpected after all. The plot is just a series of events, and it's all over way too quickly. I blame the main character for that. Clemens' acting is boring, slow, and unconvincing. Her eyes are dead, and her facial expressions are off. There aren't many interesting moments in

I've gotta say, the movie's pretty short. It's got some cool scary parts and a great soundtrack, but that's about it. For me, it's a one-time watch. I won't be re-watching it anytime soon.

Thanks for listening, everyone!)

live_helpFeatured FAQ

Is Silent Hill: Revelation a good horror movie?

Unfortunately, no. While it tries to deliver on the scares and tension of the first movie, it falls flat and feels like a lazy attempt to cash in on the success of the original.

What's the plot of Silent Hill: Revelation?

Is the movie based on the video game?

Yes, the movie is loosely based on the video game of the same name. However, it takes some significant liberties with the story and characters.

Is Silent Hill: Revelation worth watching?

Only if you're a die-hard fan of the series or a completist. Otherwise, there are better horror movies out there that deliver on the scares and tension.

What's the deal with the ending?

The ending is a major letdown and feels like a cop-out. It tries to tie up loose ends, but it doesn't make sense and feels like a lazy attempt to wrap up the story.

Is the movie scary?

Not really. While it tries to deliver on the scares, it falls flat and feels like a lazy attempt to scare the audience.

Is the movie worth watching for the visuals?

Maybe. The movie's visuals are decent, but they're not as impressive as the first film. However, they're still worth checking out if you're a fan of the series.

Is the movie worth watching for the cast?

Maybe. The cast, including Sean Bean and Carrie-Anne Moss, deliver solid performances, even if the plot doesn't give them much to work with.

check_circlePros

•The opening credits are genuinely creepy and set the tone for the rest of the movie.
•Sean Bean and Carrie-Anne Moss deliver solid performances, even if the plot doesn't give them much to work with.
•The movie's use of fog and ash is effective in creating an eerie atmosphere, even if it's not sustained throughout the film.
•The plot tries to explore some interesting themes, even if it doesn't execute them well.
•The movie's visuals are decent, even if they're not as impressive as the first film.
•The cast, including Kit Harington and Adelaide Clemens, do their best with the material they're given.

cancelCons

•The plot is predictable and lacks tension, making it hard to get invested in the story.
•The movie's attempt to connect Heather's story to the mysterious Alessa falls flat and feels forced.
•The atmosphere, while creepy at first, quickly loses its grip and becomes dull.
•The movie's use of horror tropes feels like a lazy attempt to scare the audience.
•The pacing is slow and plodding, making it hard to stay engaged.
•The movie's themes are underdeveloped and feel like an afterthought.

chat_bubble

flag

Related Reviews

More reviews in Film and TV.

View all reviews

Desperate Housewives is a Masterclass in Storytelling and Character Development

victoriaJ• last week

Desperate Housewives is a Masterclass in Storytelling and Character Development

Get the inside scoop on Desperate Housewives, a show that's full of twists and turns, complex characters, and real-life themes. Read our review to find out why

Series

thumb_up0

chat_bubble0