Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995)
A Lackluster Sequel That Falls Flat
summarizeEditor's Summary
The latest Halloween installment falls flat, relying on a convoluted plot and underdeveloped characters. The story's lack of clear direction and confusing connections to the previous films make for a disappointing viewing experience. The movie's attempt to revive the franchise feels forced and unconvincing. It's a lackluster addition to the series, with the sequel's inability to provide satisfying answers and its reliance on cheap jump scares making it a chore to watch.
settingsSpecifications
live_helpFeatured FAQ
Is this sequel a must-watch for Halloween fans?
Unfortunately, no. The movie's lack of satisfying answers and its reliance on cheap jump scares make it a disappointing addition to the series. If you're a die-hard Halloween fan, you might find some minor enjoyment in the film's atmospheric tension and occasional visual effects, but overall, it's a skippable entry in the franchise.
What's the deal with the druidic cult?
The cult is a convoluted and underdeveloped plot point that feels like a lazy attempt to tie the movie to the previous films. Without giving too much away, the cult's motivations and goals are unclear and confusing, making it difficult to become invested in their storyline.
Is the movie scary?
The film relies heavily on cheap jump scares, which can be startling at first but quickly become tiresome. If you're looking for a genuinely scary movie, you might want to look elsewhere.
What's the connection between Michael Myers and the druidic cult?
Unfortunately, the movie doesn't provide a clear explanation for Michael Myers' connection to the cult. It's a glaring plot hole that makes it difficult to become invested in the story.
Is the movie worth watching?
If you're a die-hard Halloween fan, you might find some minor enjoyment in the film's atmospheric tension and occasional visual effects. However, overall, it's a skippable entry in the franchise.
What's the deal with the movie's pacing?
The pacing is slow and plodding, making the movie feel like a chore to watch. The film's attempts to build tension and suspense are often undermined by its reliance on cheap jump scares and convenient plot devices.
Is the movie's score effective?
The score is a decent mix of eerie sound effects and pulsating electronic beats, but it's not particularly memorable or impactful.
What's the movie's theme?
The film's themes of cultism and mind control are timely and thought-provoking, but they're not particularly well-developed or explored.
Is the movie a value for money?
Unfortunately, no. The movie's lack of satisfying answers and its reliance on cheap jump scares make it a disappointing addition to the series.
check_circlePros
- •Donald Pleasence still brings his signature charm to the role of Dr. Loomis.
- •The film's atmospheric tension is occasionally effective in creating a sense of unease.
- •The score is a decent mix of eerie sound effects and pulsating electronic beats.
- •Michael Myers remains an iconic horror villain, even if his character development is lacking.
- •The movie's visuals are occasionally impressive, particularly in the scenes featuring the druidic cult.
- •The film's themes of cultism and mind control are timely and thought-provoking.
cancelCons
- •Most of the characters feel underdeveloped and lack any real depth.
- •The plot is riddled with holes and convenient plot devices.
- •The pacing is slow and plodding, making the movie feel like a chore to watch.
- •The movie's reliance on cheap jump scares gets old quickly.
- •The story's lack of clear direction and confusing connections to the previous films is frustrating.
- •The film's attempt to revive the franchise feels forced and unconvincing.
